<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Open Graph still means nothing for publishers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maxrover.co.za/blog/2010/04/26/facebook-open-graph-still-means-nothing-for-publishers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maxrover.co.za/blog/2010/04/26/facebook-open-graph-still-means-nothing-for-publishers/</link>
	<description>Digital Research.Strategy.Support for ad agencies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:08:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Roos</title>
		<link>http://www.maxrover.co.za/blog/2010/04/26/facebook-open-graph-still-means-nothing-for-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Roos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 21:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxrover.co.za/blog/?p=122#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Damn, just read the wiki and realised this for myself now. That does suck indeed. Seems a little lame that Facebook&#039;s open graph is limited to real life objects, and completely ignores the thing social media is built around - digital content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, just read the wiki and realised this for myself now. That does suck indeed. Seems a little lame that Facebook&#8217;s open graph is limited to real life objects, and completely ignores the thing social media is built around &#8211; digital content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

